Skip to main content



Crazy for God

Some reflections on the book. I'm glad to have read it, if nothing for the fact that Franky found what I am looking for and came to despise it. Greatness. Fame. Influence. Popularity. He had it all. He came to realize that mainstream evangelicalism is not a faithful body, but a fruitful business. He found that politics drove the "evangelical engine" more than sincere life-in-in-your-face faith. He points out some significant sweeping generalizations. Evangelicals are money driven. Evangelicals are independence driven. Evangelicals are activist driven. Evangelicals are make-me-feel-good-about-myself driven. If these are true (and I am sure they are to an extent) does he not need to face them? Do I not need to face them? Am I not "socially engineered" to a degree by the communities that I have run in?

His story of his life is stunning. He finds freedom to share, with unashamed honesty, the brokenness of his family. How his father Francis beat his mother. How his mother paraded her "attainment" of true spiritual goddess-likeness and threw it in your face. He shares his own fiasco's with drugs, sex, masturbation, and worldliness. He cusses.

The point is made that personality as an influence in the evangelical community is cult-like. It does not even escape the most fundamentalistic separatists of the bunch (as I was raised in). People still worship my father and will continue to do so until he either fades out or until he recants his faith (which wont happen). Christians worship John Piper. We get the scent of blood, we chase like a pack of wolves, to hear him spout his rigid take-over-the-world kind of calvanism. Christians worship Benny Hinn for his monopoly on supernatural healing powers. His signs and wonders attract millions while he doops them into emptying their savings account so "his ministry" (i.e. his multi-million dollar mansion) will continue.

Franky ultimately left Evangelicalism in search of a deeper, more human faith. A faith connected to the past, connected to the roots of what became his superficial experience with Americanized Christianity. The questions of faith are raised, but he remains one of the body of Christ as found in the Orthodox expression of faith.


Franky Schaeffer:

"...It also confirmed what I already knew: that evangelicalism is not so much a religion as a series of fast-moving personality cults.
As soon as a leader steps aside, or is shoved aside, or stumbles, the crowd looks for the next man or woman to briefly follow. There is always a bigger show down the street, another even better Bible-study leader or congregation to try, another hot author/guru to read, another trend, from speaking in tongues to giving homeschooling a try. And most evangelicals spend a good portion of their time wandering from chuch to church, from leader to leader, even from one radio and TV personality to another, in the same way that when I was a teen I'd switch my loyalty from on rock band to another. It's all about who is "hot."

"I think my problem with remaining an evangelical centered on what the evangelical community became. It was the merging of the entertainment business with faith, the flippant lightweight kitsch ugliness of American Christianity, the sheer stupidity, the paranoia of the American right-wing enterprise, the platitudes married to pop culture, all of it... that made me crazy. It was just too stupid for words.
The Greek Orthodox Church is the least-changed continuous body of Christian worship and tradition. So what? The average pebble in my driveway predates human existence by a hundred million years or so. On the other hand, if you want to try to live as a Christian, maybe it makes sense to attach yourself to a body of faith that bears at least a passing resemblance to what Christians everywhere, from the beginning of the Christian era, believed and, more importantly, did."

"Being part of the military family changed me. I found myself connected to a community that believes in service and sacrifice and that lives by what they believe. They contrasted sharply with the leaders of the big-time evangelical world. We evangelical "leaders" had talked about saving America but never made any sacrifices for our country. We left the sacrificing to our 'ordinary' followers."

Popular posts from this blog

8/15/2016

  Kevin,                                                               At this time I believe it is necessary that I inform you of what is going on internally. As a high school boys soccer coach I learned that you want team captains who are fully dedicated to the team’s success. If they aren’t, the entire team struggles to reach its goals.  While I am part of the FBBC team, I believe I am lacking in this desired leadership quality myself.  After seven full months in my current position, I do not believe my passions are managing money for the church. As a result I do not have internal peace about the longevity of my current position. I believe there are better people for this role. I believe FBBC would be a stronger organization if a person more suited for this role were here. I c...

You and Whose Army?

America elects a pro-choice candidate and suddenly my fellow Christian brothers and sisters head for the hills screaming the world has come to an end. Are not abortion rates much higher in several other countries? Why aren't we just as concerned about "life" in those countries? America elects an economically progressive candidate and people are screaming "socialism" preparing for a Rapture. (An mid-1800's invention of conservative Christian theology). Doesn't America know that Democracy is one of the youngest political philosophies to be employed? Why do we think the fate of the world depends on the success of our economical and political philosophies? America is struggling economically, and Jesus is now coming back to rescue his 2000 year old church from this difficult tribulation. Doesn't America remember that its only 232 years old? Why does God's blessing equate with monetary blessing? Why do American Christians constantly tie the end of the ...

a vow of poverty

  I’ve taken to myself the resolve to live a life towards myself as one of poverty. I am not a monk, but have the desire to follow in the path of the monk to make vows of poverty. Of course, for me, a vow of poverty will not mean the same thing - not being Roman Catholic, nor a monk. What then is a vow of poverty like for a person who has neither taken formal vows nor part of a formal religious order?  I mean by this vow: to live simply.  The first way to appropriate this vow is to refrain from debt as debt is often a sign that one is living beyond one’s means.  However, I must allow some room in this principle for living arrangements. If I were in a monastery as a monk I would surely have a place to live, how meager it may be, and thus I would have no housing expenses and so would be able to maintain a debt-free living situation. But I do not live in a monastery as a monk, and prudence would lead me to the conclusion that I must have housing for my family as I have ...