Skip to main content

Am I to blame?

What is my responsibility in the mortgage crisis?
Let me explain... in case you have not heard, the financial sector, namely, the real estate/mortgage industry is walking on the proverbially "dangerous ground." With billions of dollars in mortgages backed by people with little to no credit or ability to pay their creditors, the skyscrapers of elusive wealth seem to be disappearing in the fog. The main reason for this is simply good old fashion "greed." People hoping to get rich quick sold loans to people who couldn't afford them. Some did get rich. Some got really, really, really rich.

Indeed there are two parties to blame here. Yes, the ones who sold their souls to the green grass on the other side of the Jones' fence are just as guilty as the ones whose eyes twinkled green when they saw the opportunity to pounce and the Jones' discontented neighbors. The business is not good. Projections are being made that we may begin to recoup in late 2009. Nonetheless, at this time we continue to read of trouble and more trouble on the way. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, IndyMac, Wachovia, American Home Mortgage, Countrywide, Merrill Lynch, AIG, are all among the monstrous corporations burning out as fast as they burned up.

My job feeds this industry. My job provides services these banks and lending institutions and mortgage backers need. My job does not ask its clients these hard questions like, "Is your company's lending ethic in line with equity, justice, and all around fairness?" Or "Do you have the best interest in mind for both parties entering into the agreement?" Or "Does your lending institution's lending practices seek to extort, enslave, and enrich itself at the expense of another's quality of life?" I have heard numerous stories about incentives and bonuses for loan analysts and underwriters who approve so many loan applications. I mean consider this: The more loans you close the more bonus money you receive. The faster you disburse money, the higher your bonus check for the month. So, if you sold those loans, and realized the huge bonuses you amassed, would you not simply approve as many as possible to ensure the bonuses? I would. I would seek as little proof as possible concerning the applicants ability to repay the money. I would sell loans to people who's credit was poor (i.e. sub-prime). This was the mindset of several of the large lending institutions who are now realizing that the "money" the gave out would not return.

What responsibility do I have to the market? I understand that my company is not the real monster. They really are simply trying to make a fair living providing fair services where there is a spot in the market. But we are Christians. Should we provide monsters with services that do not have the customer's best in mind? Should we provide services to people whose eyes are so green they cannot see the light of day? Should we give our energy and efforts to support a system of injustice and inequity and ultimately the financial ruin of thousands of families? I don't know the answer to the question.

Popular posts from this blog

A response to my beloved mother: part 2

READ THIS POST FIRST MY MOTHER : "I'm a registered Conservative, but my vote counted since they endorsed McCain, so I guess it all depends on who the Libertarian's endorse, and even if it were someone difference, at least you would have had a part in voting for the "most" righteous candidate, and McCain was the one even though he's still not the Christian ideal! Remember, Bill Clinton was a "pro-choice" candidate as well as one who furthered the homosexual agenda, so it wasn't surprising to me that 9/11 happened after his term was up and it's not surprising that the economy is faltering so badly now, and it won't surprise me if Obama continues the downward spiral, even if it is into socialistic policies since that's how Europe has gone since they left off looking to God. It doesn't matter what the rest of the world is doing since the majority have been anti-God for so long and their nations have paid for that for centuries (Dark...

I don't have all the answers, but I do have two cents.

My friend and fellow recovering ex-fundamentalist , I greet you joyously knowing the freedom you have found in leaving fundamentalism, however I am saddened by your departure as a whole from our Lord. I indeed understand the hardship which you have faced is cause for questioning God’s existence, faithfulness, and love to his creation. I would like to respond to you because I feel like I understand your socio-religious background. Let me first tell you my goal is not to re-convert you, but rather to give you a second thought from one who grew up in similar roots, whose posture of faith remains bent toward the gospel. I also grew up in ultra-conservative fundamentalism. If names like Peter Ruckman, Jack Hyles, Arlin Horton, etc, mean anything to you than you will understand. I graduated from PCC. OMG. I cannot believe it, but it’s true. What a crazy place. Fear, guilt, shame, legalism were the name of the game! As long as you “caught the spirit” all of life would be good and God would b...

The Intolerance of Presbyterian Creeds

The bind between American political allegiance and Protestant evangelical conservatism is a key which unlocks the door of much early American civil history especially during the antebellum era through the early 20th century. To be conservative and American meant that you must regard a Protestant form of Christianity, namely the revivalistic, moral gospel which declared a morally conservative view of the socio-political system as king. In fact, not to be Protestant and politically conservative was in line with defaming the stars and stripes. Hart describes a situation in the early 20th century where the state of Utah elected and appointed a Mormon Apostle, Reed Smoot, to the U.S. Senate. Smoot underwent serious investigation from a Senate appointed committee to deliberate upon the ability of a Mormon to function in the place of a Senator given his religious views. The conservative Protestant ethos of the age was skeptical of any other religious conviction in its ability to be “American”...