DTS (and most NT Scholarship) certainly does take for granted that the TR is an "inferior text." It's blatantly obvious in Sproul's Knowing Scripture . Nonetheless, DTS cannot be criticized for not having alternative positions. Zane Hodges tried for many years at DTS to espouse his Majority Text position, which is very different in philosophy from the Critical Text position (UBS4 / NA27), as well as the TR position. The Majority Text (MT) position will practice textual criticism, but only within the MT or Byzantine Textual Tradition. The MT text position "counts" rather than "weighs" the manuscripts. The majority wins. Nonetheless, the Critical Text people take issue. Two prominent arguments are geneological and geographical solidarity. The Critical text argues that the MT only has limited geographical solidarity (Turkey) whereas the Critical Text enjoys much more geographical solidarity (Egypt, Turkey, Italy, Jerusalem, etc.) The critical text als...
logorrhea representing a life once lived as evangelical trying to come to terms with something called reality