Skip to main content
The Lost Soul of American Protestantism





I have continued reading books concerning the history of Christianity; namely Christianity in America. Mostly for my own personal curiosity, secondly so that I might have some sort of contextualization concerning the faith which embraced me when I embraced it. Lastly, because I see myself someday as possibly functioning in a role which would require significant understanding of American Christianity.

After just finishing Marsden's Understanding Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism I have, under the recommendation of a Lutheran Pastor whom I don't even know, begun reading D. G. Hart's The Lost Soul of American Protestantism.

He begins with a lengthy introduction laying out the thesis of the book. Here Hart begins to make his case for the inadequate view of American Christianity's history as simply being traced as the typical double vein of Fundamentalists/Conservative Evangelicals pitted against Liberal/Mainline Denominational Protestants. No doubt this view of American Christianity is legitimate to a degree, but Hart is going to argue it is unsatisfactory since it ignores the "confessional" types who were neither Fundamentalist or Liberal, nor were they evangelical. Typical American Christian history deals only with the happenings of what Hart calls "Conversionists/Pietists/Evangelicals". These are the ones, beginning with Jonathan Edwards and ending with Billy Graham, who are responsible in part for developing a specifically "American" Christianity in which Christianity in only valid because of its practicality to life. The "confessional" type differs from the "conversionist" type on several levels however, since conversionism won out in the playing field, much historical inquiry has ignored those who were neither "liberals," "fundamentalists," nor "evangelicals."

The thesis of his book is stated generally as such: To recover "the history of confessional Protestantism and examining its significance for American religion and society." (pg. xxix)

Popular posts from this blog

A response to my beloved mother: part 2

READ THIS POST FIRST MY MOTHER : "I'm a registered Conservative, but my vote counted since they endorsed McCain, so I guess it all depends on who the Libertarian's endorse, and even if it were someone difference, at least you would have had a part in voting for the "most" righteous candidate, and McCain was the one even though he's still not the Christian ideal! Remember, Bill Clinton was a "pro-choice" candidate as well as one who furthered the homosexual agenda, so it wasn't surprising to me that 9/11 happened after his term was up and it's not surprising that the economy is faltering so badly now, and it won't surprise me if Obama continues the downward spiral, even if it is into socialistic policies since that's how Europe has gone since they left off looking to God. It doesn't matter what the rest of the world is doing since the majority have been anti-God for so long and their nations have paid for that for centuries (Dark...

I don't have all the answers, but I do have two cents.

My friend and fellow recovering ex-fundamentalist , I greet you joyously knowing the freedom you have found in leaving fundamentalism, however I am saddened by your departure as a whole from our Lord. I indeed understand the hardship which you have faced is cause for questioning God’s existence, faithfulness, and love to his creation. I would like to respond to you because I feel like I understand your socio-religious background. Let me first tell you my goal is not to re-convert you, but rather to give you a second thought from one who grew up in similar roots, whose posture of faith remains bent toward the gospel. I also grew up in ultra-conservative fundamentalism. If names like Peter Ruckman, Jack Hyles, Arlin Horton, etc, mean anything to you than you will understand. I graduated from PCC. OMG. I cannot believe it, but it’s true. What a crazy place. Fear, guilt, shame, legalism were the name of the game! As long as you “caught the spirit” all of life would be good and God would b...

The Intolerance of Presbyterian Creeds

The bind between American political allegiance and Protestant evangelical conservatism is a key which unlocks the door of much early American civil history especially during the antebellum era through the early 20th century. To be conservative and American meant that you must regard a Protestant form of Christianity, namely the revivalistic, moral gospel which declared a morally conservative view of the socio-political system as king. In fact, not to be Protestant and politically conservative was in line with defaming the stars and stripes. Hart describes a situation in the early 20th century where the state of Utah elected and appointed a Mormon Apostle, Reed Smoot, to the U.S. Senate. Smoot underwent serious investigation from a Senate appointed committee to deliberate upon the ability of a Mormon to function in the place of a Senator given his religious views. The conservative Protestant ethos of the age was skeptical of any other religious conviction in its ability to be “American”...