Skip to main content

Parakeets, Raptures, and Ways of Reading the Bible

Yesterday my Amazon order arrived. Darla, the Accountant-person here at the office delivered it to me. Well, actually UPS did. I wonder how many hands actually touched it from warehouse to desk? Interesting.

Any way, I love packages. Especially packages I’m really anticipating. I think I like buying things online rather than at the store just to build the suspense, just to create an atmosphere of surprise. Everyone loves a surprise.

Within this package were two books recommended by Jesus Creed. The first: Left Behind or Left Befuddled by Gordon Isaac, a seminary professor at Gordon-Conwell Seminary. The second: Blue Parakeet by Scot McKnight (author at Jesus Creed), a seminary professor at Northpark Seminary.

I am excited about the first because it deals with a “hot” topic that I think, quite frankly, is untrue. The rapture. Isaac treats the “End Times” stuff. You know, the mysterious disappearance of thousands, if not millions… Interestingly enough, after attending Dallas Seminary, the guardian of Dispensationalism and Pre-Millennial, Pre-Tribulational Eschatology, I can no longer hold to the idea of a “Secret Rapture.“ That’s ironic. My reasoning? Well, they are legion, but mainly because Church History/Tradition does not support it, and because, more importantly, the Bible doesn’t teach it. Ha. I can already feel the pulses beating faster, palms getting sweatier, breathing getting deeper!

One has to read the Bible with a very specific “interpretational eye.” A “method” if you will: a method that treats the Bible as a puzzle, a sort of mystery-science theatre. This method ignores the fact that the Bible is literature. A method that thinks like a 19th-20th century Westerner. But who knows? It doesn’t really matter. You don’t have to believe it to be “caught up” in it! I don’t think. What do I replace it with? Good question… I think I have moved to a classical Pre-Millennial position on the 2nd coming. I need to read and study more. Something required since I will most likely confront this issue for the rest of my life.

I am even more excited about the second because this book deals with the issue of interpreting or reading the Bible. It is fundamentally related to the above mentioned book.

How do we read the Bible? What is appropriate? How should we be thinking? What, after all is the Bible? In what context(s) did it arise? What did people think like in those contexts? How has the Church read the Bible over the past 2,000 years? How do we read the Bible today? Which is right, or better, which is more appropriate? Any way, I like Scot McKnight. He is devout Christian, a first rate NT scholar. It seems he is a funny, witty, and open man with an honest heart, and he comes from a similar background. It’s always nice to see others who were born in similar contexts rethinking and rehashing and reflecting on the assumptions, values, and beliefs of the former generation.

Well, I will update my blog around half way and upon completion. So far I have read the first 30 or so pages and enjoyed every bit of it. The point so far: Everyone picks and chooses what they want when reading the Bible. No one actually practices the whole Bible. So, McKnight sarcastically reminds us, the slogan “God said, I believe it, that settles it for me!” is, in his words, “hogwash!” There are plenty of things God said that we don’t do. Like stone adulterers - God forbid, because then hundreds, if not thousands, of Christian ministers/pastors, laypersons, and parishioners would be dead. And we certainly don’t believe everything Jesus said, since I rarely see people in churches missing eyes or hands or feet. :-)

Popular posts from this blog

A response to my beloved mother: part 2

READ THIS POST FIRST MY MOTHER : "I'm a registered Conservative, but my vote counted since they endorsed McCain, so I guess it all depends on who the Libertarian's endorse, and even if it were someone difference, at least you would have had a part in voting for the "most" righteous candidate, and McCain was the one even though he's still not the Christian ideal! Remember, Bill Clinton was a "pro-choice" candidate as well as one who furthered the homosexual agenda, so it wasn't surprising to me that 9/11 happened after his term was up and it's not surprising that the economy is faltering so badly now, and it won't surprise me if Obama continues the downward spiral, even if it is into socialistic policies since that's how Europe has gone since they left off looking to God. It doesn't matter what the rest of the world is doing since the majority have been anti-God for so long and their nations have paid for that for centuries (Dark

I don't have all the answers, but I do have two cents.

My friend and fellow recovering ex-fundamentalist , I greet you joyously knowing the freedom you have found in leaving fundamentalism, however I am saddened by your departure as a whole from our Lord. I indeed understand the hardship which you have faced is cause for questioning God’s existence, faithfulness, and love to his creation. I would like to respond to you because I feel like I understand your socio-religious background. Let me first tell you my goal is not to re-convert you, but rather to give you a second thought from one who grew up in similar roots, whose posture of faith remains bent toward the gospel. I also grew up in ultra-conservative fundamentalism. If names like Peter Ruckman, Jack Hyles, Arlin Horton, etc, mean anything to you than you will understand. I graduated from PCC. OMG. I cannot believe it, but it’s true. What a crazy place. Fear, guilt, shame, legalism were the name of the game! As long as you “caught the spirit” all of life would be good and God would b

The Intolerance of Presbyterian Creeds

The bind between American political allegiance and Protestant evangelical conservatism is a key which unlocks the door of much early American civil history especially during the antebellum era through the early 20th century. To be conservative and American meant that you must regard a Protestant form of Christianity, namely the revivalistic, moral gospel which declared a morally conservative view of the socio-political system as king. In fact, not to be Protestant and politically conservative was in line with defaming the stars and stripes. Hart describes a situation in the early 20th century where the state of Utah elected and appointed a Mormon Apostle, Reed Smoot, to the U.S. Senate. Smoot underwent serious investigation from a Senate appointed committee to deliberate upon the ability of a Mormon to function in the place of a Senator given his religious views. The conservative Protestant ethos of the age was skeptical of any other religious conviction in its ability to be “American”