Skip to main content



Intro:

When Christians - both Protestants and Catholics alike - talk about Scripture, authority, tradition, intellect, and how it is that they have come to view the world in which they exist, how they believe that it began and how they think it will end, and how to live rightly in the face of its seeming unconquerable evil, most Christians will unashamedly and without a thoughtless moment speak that it is only within the ancient pages of the Scriptures that they find their basis for knowledge, reality, true virtue, and ultimately their final hope. In all actuality this reality of reliance upon Scripture is only the result of the goodness and favor of the Lord, for, as confessing evangelicals we believe it is only through his Word that the world is made alive because of the working of the Spirit in the creation through that Word. To that end, it is only with great thankfulness that we approach the Scriptures as the only true eternal revelation, being authoritative over all creation, both humankind and nature. As a matter of fact thousands upon thousands of Christians, from the nominal to the most faithful, have made it their distinct and fundamental business to know (to whatever degree) the teachings of the pages found within the Christian Bible. And not only that, but as a matter of fact, as one author rightly points out, though his reference is limited to evangelicals, that most of those readers of the Scripture seek “to construct [their] theology on the teaching of the Bible, the whole Bible, and nothing but the Bible.”

Most will not see this as a problem. Actually, the opposite is overwhelmingly true - most will see this phenomenon as simply a manifestation of the manifold mercies of the Lord. After all, the common understanding looks at what happened in the Middle Ages, rather should they be called the “Dark Ages,” and indicts the Roman Catholic Church to the witness stand for withholding the Scriptures from the hands of the “common people” and depositing them into the vaults of the “educated elite” of the religious institutions (churches, monasteries, universities, etc.). The result of this holy hijacking was mass biblical illiteracy among the people, who, eventually, because they could not think for themselves, were forced to buy into a system of man-made religious harlotry, all of which the Pope is eternally responsible.

Whether this view of history is actually the case is debated, but nonetheless the Scriptures have been “freed” from their institutional captivity and institutional code languages and have been placed back into the hands of the common people in the common languages. Unfortunately, the case is not that the Scriptures are free. In fact, the Scriptures will never be free. The Scriptures will always be captive to the assumptions, opinions, and approaches of the readers to the text. It can be maintained that the Scriptures have simply found themselves to be freed only to be taken captive again, only this time, their new captivity is the result of the denial of the tradition from which the Scriptures arose and the placing the reading of the text within the prison of methodological walls. The Scriptures are to be read in a fashion, the methodologists maintain, that is faithful to the critical scalpels of the exegetical surgeons, those who are able to gather all the data from their biblical cadaver, appropriate the correct linguistic, historical, and scientific surgical tools, diagnose their findings following strict laboratory procedures, and finally offer the true antidote of only “biblical” interpretation which we can live by and trust. Surely this captivity is no less promising than the Roman captivity, for its allegiances lie outside of the principle of faith and within the principle of humankind’s reason.

Methodology has replaced the confessions within the broader evangelical community's hermeneutical pursuit. The evangelical community will not deny that it carries with it the long standing tradition of Christian history, however it has denied the rightful place of the confessions as being a lens through which the scriptures are read. Fascinations with "objectivism" and "empiricism" has diluted the strength of modern scholarly interpretation. (Though much of that can be attributed to the fact that many modern "interpreters" are unbelievers without the eternal Spirit of God.) The interpretation of scripture in the evangelical community must embrace the confessions in its dialogue with the text as normative.

Popular posts from this blog

A response to my beloved mother: part 2

READ THIS POST FIRST MY MOTHER : "I'm a registered Conservative, but my vote counted since they endorsed McCain, so I guess it all depends on who the Libertarian's endorse, and even if it were someone difference, at least you would have had a part in voting for the "most" righteous candidate, and McCain was the one even though he's still not the Christian ideal! Remember, Bill Clinton was a "pro-choice" candidate as well as one who furthered the homosexual agenda, so it wasn't surprising to me that 9/11 happened after his term was up and it's not surprising that the economy is faltering so badly now, and it won't surprise me if Obama continues the downward spiral, even if it is into socialistic policies since that's how Europe has gone since they left off looking to God. It doesn't matter what the rest of the world is doing since the majority have been anti-God for so long and their nations have paid for that for centuries (Dark...

I don't have all the answers, but I do have two cents.

My friend and fellow recovering ex-fundamentalist , I greet you joyously knowing the freedom you have found in leaving fundamentalism, however I am saddened by your departure as a whole from our Lord. I indeed understand the hardship which you have faced is cause for questioning God’s existence, faithfulness, and love to his creation. I would like to respond to you because I feel like I understand your socio-religious background. Let me first tell you my goal is not to re-convert you, but rather to give you a second thought from one who grew up in similar roots, whose posture of faith remains bent toward the gospel. I also grew up in ultra-conservative fundamentalism. If names like Peter Ruckman, Jack Hyles, Arlin Horton, etc, mean anything to you than you will understand. I graduated from PCC. OMG. I cannot believe it, but it’s true. What a crazy place. Fear, guilt, shame, legalism were the name of the game! As long as you “caught the spirit” all of life would be good and God would b...

The Intolerance of Presbyterian Creeds

The bind between American political allegiance and Protestant evangelical conservatism is a key which unlocks the door of much early American civil history especially during the antebellum era through the early 20th century. To be conservative and American meant that you must regard a Protestant form of Christianity, namely the revivalistic, moral gospel which declared a morally conservative view of the socio-political system as king. In fact, not to be Protestant and politically conservative was in line with defaming the stars and stripes. Hart describes a situation in the early 20th century where the state of Utah elected and appointed a Mormon Apostle, Reed Smoot, to the U.S. Senate. Smoot underwent serious investigation from a Senate appointed committee to deliberate upon the ability of a Mormon to function in the place of a Senator given his religious views. The conservative Protestant ethos of the age was skeptical of any other religious conviction in its ability to be “American”...