Skip to main content

Crisis!


Our nation is in crisis, or so says the pre-revival advertisement published by www.thecall.com. The advertisement I picked up this morning proposes (or foretells???) an upcoming revival to be held on August, 16th 2008 at the nation’s capital in Washington, DC.

With all good advertising mediums there is provoking graphic design along with the “hook” which tells the “buyer” that he or she cannot live without the advertised product. In this case, the “buyer” is most likely an evangelical middle-class semi-affluent white-suburban young-to-middle-aged American who will be “buying” revival for our nation. Revival too what, I don’t know, it doesn’t say.

The “hook” of the advertisement states that there is a “crisis” in the once God-favored land of America (not the world mind you, only in the blessed land of U-mur-ca). The “crisis” is subtly tied to the American political system on the 2"x 2" poster-card as a photo of the White House and George Washington (?) on his horse decorates the background.

What is being said here? What is the crisis? Unfortunately the advertisement does not make that clear, but what it does propose is that (through inventive tactics of a “revival”) the anticipated event might change this nation. A stimulating question is posed at the bottom: “Can a nation be changed in one day?” Well, I guess it could, especially when you don’t define the change for which you are looking. Only in America do we expect instant results and instant satisfaction.

Another principle of good advertising is that the “buyer” should be left with unanswered questions. This tactic “reels” the “buyer” in to ask questions, to develop interest, and the “seller” is more likely to make the sale (Hey, after all every one has a mortgage to pay and food to put on the table, and all possible roads should be explored which lead to those ends). I realize my criticism is somewhat unfounded, and it is likely that the religious retailers working for revival have good intentions, but the problem of this "revival" is, ironically, also its intentions. Like my seminary professor John Hannah used to say, "It's not bad people who do bad things for bad reasons that's the problem, its good people who do bad things for good reasons." This campaign is an attempt to market and capitalize on a nation whose current socio-economic environment is weakening and gasping for breath with our massive amounts of debt and overspending. Once again, a good marketing scheme will appeal to the “entitlement” nature of humans and more so the “survival” of the buyer.

I’m afraid the real referent to “crisis” here has more to do with soaring gas prices, home foreclosures, job cuts, the possible election of a democratic president, and rising food costs more than it has to do with the spiritual vibrancy and life of the Church. This “revival” ironically comes at a point when a specifically American lifestyle of affluence, ease, and convenience is at risk. Maybe if we make God think we are a “Christian” nation again, he will remove the ichabod sign and return financial and economic blessing to our land.

Also, as an aside, a brief look at the history of “revival” in America over the past 200 years will demonstrate that “revival” has rarely benefited the American Church; rather it has only hindered the progress of Christian truth and teaching through emotionalism and anti-intellectualism. I call Christians in America, not Americans, to return to the tradition of Christian doctrine and piety found in the life of the Church, not the sort of feel-good American-way of happy, emotional fervor and safety that a stable economic situation will potentially offer.

Popular posts from this blog

A response to my beloved mother: part 2

READ THIS POST FIRST MY MOTHER : "I'm a registered Conservative, but my vote counted since they endorsed McCain, so I guess it all depends on who the Libertarian's endorse, and even if it were someone difference, at least you would have had a part in voting for the "most" righteous candidate, and McCain was the one even though he's still not the Christian ideal! Remember, Bill Clinton was a "pro-choice" candidate as well as one who furthered the homosexual agenda, so it wasn't surprising to me that 9/11 happened after his term was up and it's not surprising that the economy is faltering so badly now, and it won't surprise me if Obama continues the downward spiral, even if it is into socialistic policies since that's how Europe has gone since they left off looking to God. It doesn't matter what the rest of the world is doing since the majority have been anti-God for so long and their nations have paid for that for centuries (Dark...

I don't have all the answers, but I do have two cents.

My friend and fellow recovering ex-fundamentalist , I greet you joyously knowing the freedom you have found in leaving fundamentalism, however I am saddened by your departure as a whole from our Lord. I indeed understand the hardship which you have faced is cause for questioning God’s existence, faithfulness, and love to his creation. I would like to respond to you because I feel like I understand your socio-religious background. Let me first tell you my goal is not to re-convert you, but rather to give you a second thought from one who grew up in similar roots, whose posture of faith remains bent toward the gospel. I also grew up in ultra-conservative fundamentalism. If names like Peter Ruckman, Jack Hyles, Arlin Horton, etc, mean anything to you than you will understand. I graduated from PCC. OMG. I cannot believe it, but it’s true. What a crazy place. Fear, guilt, shame, legalism were the name of the game! As long as you “caught the spirit” all of life would be good and God would b...

The Intolerance of Presbyterian Creeds

The bind between American political allegiance and Protestant evangelical conservatism is a key which unlocks the door of much early American civil history especially during the antebellum era through the early 20th century. To be conservative and American meant that you must regard a Protestant form of Christianity, namely the revivalistic, moral gospel which declared a morally conservative view of the socio-political system as king. In fact, not to be Protestant and politically conservative was in line with defaming the stars and stripes. Hart describes a situation in the early 20th century where the state of Utah elected and appointed a Mormon Apostle, Reed Smoot, to the U.S. Senate. Smoot underwent serious investigation from a Senate appointed committee to deliberate upon the ability of a Mormon to function in the place of a Senator given his religious views. The conservative Protestant ethos of the age was skeptical of any other religious conviction in its ability to be “American”...