Skip to main content

to amanda

I wanted to explain myself, but I don't know how to express what I think very well, but at last, I must try. It is not my nature to be simple. It is rather my nature to complicate where complication is not needed. So please, forgive me.

First, you had my attention the minute I met you. I am sure I am not the first, nor will I be the last. There is a beauty that is instantly recognizable, though not every one in the same manner. "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder." Nonetheless I found a creation that was indeed beautiful, and instantly I was drawn as moth is to the light.

Second, not all that is beautiful is desirable. How that determination is made, once again, is different for all. What is desirable may not even be beautiful. I have found that, as concerns the affectionate, something/someone that is both beautiful and desirable is a rare joy to behold worth seeking out, and I found that in you, even if the time was short.

Third, there are things in this world that bring us great joy, but they are often two-edged swords because they certainly may offer a pain equal to or even sometimes greater than the joy. Relationships are one of those two-edged swords. I often think of love and relationships like electricity. One may never turn the switch on, and surely they are free from the possibility of being burned, yet they will never experience the possibility of the light's beauty. The one who turns the switch on may be burned, but they may also experience the joy that the light brings. When we turn switches on, switches like love, we instantly place ourselves in harms way. There is no safety in love in a broken world. I know from brief conversations with you and a couple friends that you have been burned, and for that I am deeply sorry. Knowing this about you helps me to understand how to approach you, and I admit that I did not approach you well. Blinded by my wishful and even expectant hopes, I was thinking only of myself and I realize that may have caused some sour feelings. It was an error of ignorance rather than intention, but an error nonetheless.

All of this to say that I have found you to be both beautiful and desirable, yet I also know you have experienced deep pain in relationship and are hesitant to place yourself in a vulnerable situation for a time. I wish to continue getting to know you more. I want to meet you where you are and continue on a path that friends would share where we might simply talk with each other, encourage each other, laugh, and have fun. With this better perspective I can be sensitive to your heart and its need for healing. I have also come to know that I must leave the story open-ended. How all this will look is mystery as it ought to be. Like you said, it should be natural. I think our conversation on Thursday helped me to gain a healthy perspective. My mind clouds easily with rash pursuit when I begin to feel a strong attraction toward a woman and I need something to bring me out of those clouds.

I have written this to you, but I believe, as a sort of processing, I wrote it just as much for myself as I did for you. Having said all of this I hope we can be friends.

Popular posts from this blog

A response to my beloved mother: part 2

READ THIS POST FIRST MY MOTHER : "I'm a registered Conservative, but my vote counted since they endorsed McCain, so I guess it all depends on who the Libertarian's endorse, and even if it were someone difference, at least you would have had a part in voting for the "most" righteous candidate, and McCain was the one even though he's still not the Christian ideal! Remember, Bill Clinton was a "pro-choice" candidate as well as one who furthered the homosexual agenda, so it wasn't surprising to me that 9/11 happened after his term was up and it's not surprising that the economy is faltering so badly now, and it won't surprise me if Obama continues the downward spiral, even if it is into socialistic policies since that's how Europe has gone since they left off looking to God. It doesn't matter what the rest of the world is doing since the majority have been anti-God for so long and their nations have paid for that for centuries (Dark...

I don't have all the answers, but I do have two cents.

My friend and fellow recovering ex-fundamentalist , I greet you joyously knowing the freedom you have found in leaving fundamentalism, however I am saddened by your departure as a whole from our Lord. I indeed understand the hardship which you have faced is cause for questioning God’s existence, faithfulness, and love to his creation. I would like to respond to you because I feel like I understand your socio-religious background. Let me first tell you my goal is not to re-convert you, but rather to give you a second thought from one who grew up in similar roots, whose posture of faith remains bent toward the gospel. I also grew up in ultra-conservative fundamentalism. If names like Peter Ruckman, Jack Hyles, Arlin Horton, etc, mean anything to you than you will understand. I graduated from PCC. OMG. I cannot believe it, but it’s true. What a crazy place. Fear, guilt, shame, legalism were the name of the game! As long as you “caught the spirit” all of life would be good and God would b...

The Intolerance of Presbyterian Creeds

The bind between American political allegiance and Protestant evangelical conservatism is a key which unlocks the door of much early American civil history especially during the antebellum era through the early 20th century. To be conservative and American meant that you must regard a Protestant form of Christianity, namely the revivalistic, moral gospel which declared a morally conservative view of the socio-political system as king. In fact, not to be Protestant and politically conservative was in line with defaming the stars and stripes. Hart describes a situation in the early 20th century where the state of Utah elected and appointed a Mormon Apostle, Reed Smoot, to the U.S. Senate. Smoot underwent serious investigation from a Senate appointed committee to deliberate upon the ability of a Mormon to function in the place of a Senator given his religious views. The conservative Protestant ethos of the age was skeptical of any other religious conviction in its ability to be “American”...